Friday, January 19, 2018
Friday, January 12, 2018
The Age of Consequences documentary
Another slick professionally made PR tools to promote geoengineering in the name of sustainability--
it is obvious that the goal in producing such a lavish and slick documentary is to establish a consensus that climate intervention is a necessity---a risk to be sure (hence the title---since when has there been an age without consequences?) I encourage viewers to clearly see the tendentious manner in which this documentary was created---every thesis and point it makes with a clear overarching heuristic--to justify radical geoengineering techniques such as carbon sequestration (the strawman) and chemtrails (the actual goal of this film's argument).
It's principal experts also have used TED talks toward this goal as well. Note that the term 'science' no longer has an empirical or evidential basis---climatologists and climate science seeks expert consensus in order to deploy putative solutions to the Global Warming Crisis---whether or not there is such a crisis is a matter of belief since there is no material evidence for such a thesis. Moreover it is a pseudoscience that parades as science, since there is no allowance for considering the matter with critical intelligence. It is simply that if one does not go along with the experts, one is called a kook.
Here is the trailer---
https://vimeo.com/189104269
The film will be viewed at the State Theatre w/ a panel of experts on April 11, 2018
Having attended the last SCRIM film I know that no pre-screened (therefore authentic or real) questions will be addressed. All questions are gathered in advance of the film.
it is obvious that the goal in producing such a lavish and slick documentary is to establish a consensus that climate intervention is a necessity---a risk to be sure (hence the title---since when has there been an age without consequences?) I encourage viewers to clearly see the tendentious manner in which this documentary was created---every thesis and point it makes with a clear overarching heuristic--to justify radical geoengineering techniques such as carbon sequestration (the strawman) and chemtrails (the actual goal of this film's argument).
It's principal experts also have used TED talks toward this goal as well. Note that the term 'science' no longer has an empirical or evidential basis---climatologists and climate science seeks expert consensus in order to deploy putative solutions to the Global Warming Crisis---whether or not there is such a crisis is a matter of belief since there is no material evidence for such a thesis. Moreover it is a pseudoscience that parades as science, since there is no allowance for considering the matter with critical intelligence. It is simply that if one does not go along with the experts, one is called a kook.
Here is the trailer---
https://vimeo.com/189104269
The film will be viewed at the State Theatre w/ a panel of experts on April 11, 2018
Having attended the last SCRIM film I know that no pre-screened (therefore authentic or real) questions will be addressed. All questions are gathered in advance of the film.
Highly referenced research article concerning chemtrails.....
BTW: What exactly is 'Meteorology Practice'; as in David W. Titley is a professor of meteorology practice at Penn State?
Does the practice threaten the scientific legitimacy?
What other ___________ practice roles now exist (physics, medicine, etc.)
https://www.globalresearch.ca/chemtrails-aerosol-and-electromagnetic-weapons-in-the-age-of-nuclear-war-4/5617879
Does the practice threaten the scientific legitimacy?
What other ___________ practice roles now exist (physics, medicine, etc.)
https://www.globalresearch.ca/chemtrails-aerosol-and-electromagnetic-weapons-in-the-age-of-nuclear-war-4/5617879
David W. Titley and David Keith: Scientists now Wear Two Hats
A new trend has scientists and in particular climate scientists also having simultaneous academic teaching positions and authority in public policy alongside consulting roles and roles within the government and defense departments.
Example #1: David W. Titley (retired US military, Penn State faculty in two domains, government role)
http://news.psu.edu/story/500394/2018/01/11/research/titley-chair-new-advisory-committee-national-academies?utm_source=newswire&utm_medium=email&utm_term=500496_HTML&utm_content=01-11-2018-22-19&utm_campaign=Penn%20State%20Today
Example #2: David keith (harvard faculty in 2 domains; keith group)
https://www.seas.harvard.edu/directory/dkeith
Figure it out yourself---universities are now acting as double agents with top secret military research and public policy hidden in plain sight---
Example #1: David W. Titley (retired US military, Penn State faculty in two domains, government role)
http://news.psu.edu/story/500394/2018/01/11/research/titley-chair-new-advisory-committee-national-academies?utm_source=newswire&utm_medium=email&utm_term=500496_HTML&utm_content=01-11-2018-22-19&utm_campaign=Penn%20State%20Today
Example #2: David keith (harvard faculty in 2 domains; keith group)
https://www.seas.harvard.edu/directory/dkeith
Figure it out yourself---universities are now acting as double agents with top secret military research and public policy hidden in plain sight---
Monday, December 11, 2017
Monday, December 04, 2017
Sunday, December 03, 2017
Friday, December 01, 2017
Wednesday, November 29, 2017
Listen to the Entire Album: Road to Escondido (JJ Cale and Eric Clapton)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqgMbC6eWR4https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqgMbC6eWR4
Request to Pope Francis to Exonerate Pierre Teilhard de Chardin from the Monitum
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnfarrell/2017/11/24/vatican-council-asks-the-pope-to-exonerate-jesuit-scientists-writings/#1c64ee9b45e8
This is crucial because Teilhard's 'noosphere' is being attempted 'materialistically' i.e., via nanotechnology.
This is crucial because Teilhard's 'noosphere' is being attempted 'materialistically' i.e., via nanotechnology.
Monday, October 23, 2017
Tuesday, October 03, 2017
Monday, October 02, 2017
Tuesday, August 01, 2017
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
Sunday, July 23, 2017
Saturday, July 15, 2017
Friday, July 14, 2017
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
Thursday, July 06, 2017
Monday, July 03, 2017
Thursday, June 29, 2017
Tuesday, June 27, 2017
Weather Management
Evening’s pale charger has catapulted
the charcoal horizon
sun’s chariot streaks
rainbow sherbert-breasted
cirrho-cumulus tufts
in swirls of chemtrails
painted by solar geoengineers.
I hear him boasting of his masterpiece [as though he or she were not the handiwork of God!]:
“No Leonardo is required!
I have no pretension to artistry
and yet look:
even Rubens could not geoengineer such a sunset.
This is the 21st century!”
And so, the sunset continues to fade in velvet-stroked cerulean blues over roseate tufts of cotton candy pink diffused light
now chroma is disappearing
the cicada’s song rising to yet another crescendo and falling to a whisper with the tree frog
over a chirping cricket polyphony.
Such dense music.
Evening’s charger has catapulted into her charcoal palace
as the music of pennsylvania’s woods wafts and fades.
In late august all is wan and sear.
Such dense beauty.
Monday, June 26, 2017
Friday, June 23, 2017
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
Thursday, June 15, 2017
Wednesday, June 14, 2017
Tuesday, June 13, 2017
Monday, June 12, 2017
Bonhoeffer's Quote
The fact that the foolish person is often stubborn must not blind us to the fact that he is not independent. In conversation with him, one virtually feels that one is dealing not at all with him as a person, but with slogans, catchwords, and the like that have taken possession of him.
He is under a spell, blinded, misused, and abused in his very being. Having thus become a mindless tool, the foolish person will also be capable of any evil and at the same time incapable of seeing that it is evil. This is where the danger of diabolical misuse lurks, for it is this that can once and for all destroy human beings.”
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers From Prison
He is under a spell, blinded, misused, and abused in his very being. Having thus become a mindless tool, the foolish person will also be capable of any evil and at the same time incapable of seeing that it is evil. This is where the danger of diabolical misuse lurks, for it is this that can once and for all destroy human beings.”
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers From Prison
Thursday, June 08, 2017
Wednesday, June 07, 2017
What color is your day?
Dad used to ask his children: What color of day will it be? Today was a fine day---reminds me of Ireland's thick full breasted Spring sky and now we are into June by one week! I am working the soils and it is such a wondrous and beautiful---to help nature and God with the fine details of his vegetable world. The rabbits are doing wonderful---very prolific---mothers digging nests and stuffing their mouths the wee kits and bunnies feeling the exuberance of this calm day---they are at play. Olivia (pictured below) kept guard over the yard and acted as a "captain" of the territory---in charge! Two cats had begun to creep in on Sherpa (lop-eared rabbit)---I caught them just in time---a third back-up was on the way. After routing out the cats, I picked up Sherpa who looked at me quizzically: I said, "You know, Sherpa, it is time for you to go inside." The day is magnificent---Walt Whitman calls it a "specimen day". Van Morrison sings about the country fair---and the "wide open day". It is a "soft-cushioned" day meaning that the edges are soft and the sounds are muffled, the overall effect is soothing. I can hear Dad asking me, "Son what color is your day?" It is the rich brown of rabbit soil! 
Tuesday, June 06, 2017
Dostoevsky's Take on Socialism and Do-Gooders
“Having detached themselves from the people, they naturally also lost God. The restless among them become atheists; the apathetic and placid ones waxed indifferent. For the Russian people they felt nothing but contempt, believing, however, that they loved the people and wished them the best of everything. But they loved the people negatively, conceiving in their stead [italics mine] some ideal people, such as according to their notions, the Russian people ought to be (Diary, vol. 1, p. 5).”
Substitute the word ‘American’ in the place of ‘Russian’ and one has the sense of a “putative liberal”---perhaps of the Clinton stripe---but actually quite broadly the very type of the “cool” , agnostic, well educated, post-1970s american--- And this applies to all the races in america, the common feature tends to be higher education. Enlightened liberals should be ---well ‘liberal’! They should be open-minded toward all gender transfiguration therapies and other alternative lifestyles...because...because...it’s the right thing to do! One has the sense that we care more about Caitlyn Jenner and Ellen Degeneres than the old lady on the corner of the street.
Back to Dostoevsky’s quote: for actual existing american individuals these people feel nothing but contempt or a patronizing pity. But man do they love mankind---they are committed to the wellbeing of every village, shanty, hamlet...from Syria to Timbuktu ”I am a socialist---I vow to love humanity once they are formed in a reasonable user friendly way and brought up to snuff with our cultural ‘best practices’.” Never mind that this is profound form of disrespect for the actual culture of the actual existing human beings and moreover is a reproach to God, the Creator. "Yahweh, You could have done a better job, so we are going to have to take over and fix things up." By the way, that is the core definition of the mission of one aspect of the Catholic Church. The new twist is that the new church is a global science of “helping” everything and everybody to get better! Until that day when these poor, pathetic individuals can be brought up to speed, with technology and the same kind of hopes and dreams that liberals everywhere enjoy. This is the essence of socialism thanks to the dynamic duo of Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg---I want to save the world, we are the world, but my neighbors are idiots, oh wait since I became a billionaire, I haven’t actually had to rub elbows with the proletariat, I haven’t actually spoken with a real existing individual who does not share my identical social metrics, etc... That’s OK, surely Elon Musk, Obama, and Eric Schmidt will save the day!
Allow me to take the liberty of using the term do-gooder in a qualified and operational sense. I recall a little coin box on our family dinner table in the ‘70s---my brother was putting $2.36 as the value of his meal into the box which would raise funds to feed a starving child in Africa. This practice surely had an impact in planting the seeds of what would later become a prevalent attitude toward doing good deeds for people half way around the world. Meanwhile no one noticed that our customs were slipping away just as fast as the globalist aspirations were being formed. Fast forward to 2017 when nearly every american is uprooted---call it social mobility---but having left behind the soil of their youth to greedy capitalists and corrupt local bully polluticians (let it stand)---the overall destruction of the american soil and water is thanks to the diaspora of small town boys and girls to urban centers in the ‘90s and after---this paints a picture of the type of person I describe as a ‘putative liberal.” This class of folk tend to be friends of the world, globalists, techies and do-gooders who loyally believe in global warming because the scientists and academicians and TED talkers say so. They also therefore “believe in” (fall hook, line and sinker) geoscience, solar geoengineering (chemtrails)---they might even have a suspicion that the 9/11 truthers might be onto something, but they are more inclined to believe the “climate scientists” more than the truther physicists. After all no one has to feel guilty for the planned demolition of WTC 1, 2 and 7 Buildings. But as for global warming---it cashed out in individual moral responsibility (carbon ‘footprint’).
Can anybody else see that two ‘sciences’ are being practiced? Empirical science which requires evidence for truth (such as physics-when a physicist tells you that the WTC buildings fell at free fall 9.8meters per second per second, this means that it is a physical impossibility that the Official Report account is true. And this means that this NIST scientists who corroborated this finding are either lying or incompetent or both). Next we find the term ‘science’ being used in everything from kids ‘science’ camps, to Bill Nye the ‘science’ guy, to the Big Bang versus Creation Science, to climate science and many other dubious practices many of which are simply “pseudo-science.” Such ‘science’ is non-falsifiable as in Global Warming Theory---it requires a meta-narrative---for example, anthropogenic global warming in order to cash out the kind of plan of action called for. Science refers here to a global governance, a kind of Brave New World Church. It is a belief system that is widely accepted as truth by do gooders and putative liberals everywhere. So, there is no question that when an option for doing something (anything) rather than nothing is available a do-gooder will opt to take it or sponsor the idea. For example if aerosol spraying of the atmosphere is required to try to save the planet from extinction even if the odds are less than one per cent of it happening then this demands that a risk be taken to “research” chemtrails, even if the risk is greater than the risk which justified them taking this course of action in the first place. :) If there is a snowball’s chance in hell of doing some “miraculous” medical intervention on a kid, then by golly, we need to do that.
Ah, but this is a diversion, I am talking about do-gooders tendency to believe in whatever kind of theory (science) that their culture presents (transgender science, bioevolution and the proliferations of meta-sciences) hence making them susceptible to chemtrails and not the kind of socialism Dostoevsky wrote about in the passage above. But I am making the claim that the person he is describing above is of the same stripe. It is not the right of an enlightened liberal to question Global Warming or any other globally sanctioned, peer reviewed science---any more than a good catholic should question the virgin birth--- so there!
Commentary:
In F. M. Dostoievsky’s [sic] Diary of a Writer (2 volumes, tr. Boris Brasol) in his publication of the diary in 1873, Dostoevsky squarely relates a profound fact about globalism and socialism. In this remark concerning ‘gentilhomme russe et citoyen du monde’ [“a Russian gentleman and citizen of the world”] he reveals that for the socialists the “... last ties with Russian soil and Russian truths had disintegrated (Diary, vol. 1, p. 5).” This citizen of the world calls to mind two references: firstly, in the sacred scriptures Jesus warns against being a “friend of the world” which is precisely what ‘citoyen du monde’ echoes. The second suggestion to be drawn is the idea of a diasporic ‘cosmopolitan, deracinated Jew.
Monday, June 05, 2017
Sapiens: A Brief History of Mankind ---- Must Read: But for Another Reason
http://www.businessinsider.com/bill-gates-mark-zuckerberg-and-barack-obama-recommend-this-book-2017-6
Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and Barack Obama all recommend this book---that recommends it as a NON-read in my estimation (what do any of these men know about human nature?). But since at least with Bill Gates who attempts to rule the world with his billions funding chemtrails, global, universal immunization---yet, has no real background in anthropology, or philosophical anthropology---and Mark Zuckerberg's knowledge is limited to computing---one must take note of their recommendation for another reason: it may provide a clue as to their misguided efforts at ruling the world and their do-gooder philanthropy which has an ulterior motive. For this reason perhaps it should be read.
Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and Barack Obama all recommend this book---that recommends it as a NON-read in my estimation (what do any of these men know about human nature?). But since at least with Bill Gates who attempts to rule the world with his billions funding chemtrails, global, universal immunization---yet, has no real background in anthropology, or philosophical anthropology---and Mark Zuckerberg's knowledge is limited to computing---one must take note of their recommendation for another reason: it may provide a clue as to their misguided efforts at ruling the world and their do-gooder philanthropy which has an ulterior motive. For this reason perhaps it should be read.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)